Totaal aantal pageviews

donderdag 30 juni 2011

Was 'Srebrenica genocide' a hoax?

  .Ratko Mladic, Potocari / Srebrenica on July 13, 1995.Indeed, it must be pointed out that Bosnian Serb forces allowed Muslim women and others, to flee Srebrenica.  Yet clearly the Muslim Bosniak forces cared little about this and many Serbian women, old people, and Serbs in general, were massacred/1300!!!/ in surrounding villages.Also, in direct proportion to the success of the truth coming out, expect also the direct murder of Ratko Mladic, just as Slobodan Milosevic was also murdered in his Hague Prison, by poisoning.   Former NATO spokesman Jamie Shea stressed back in 1999 that, without NATO, there would be no Hague Tribunal to begin with. He asserted that NATO and the Hague Tribunal are “allies and friends”.....                                                                                         .In this picture is beautiful to behold, and not just adult men and women  kinderen.Waarom they were not slain .........Western governments, news media, and the U.N. War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague have assiduously misled the public about the nature of the massacre..The International Commission for Missing Persons, also known as ICMP, is systematically deluding the public about the true reach of DNA technology in order to foster the illusion that its laboratories hold the key to the solution of the Srebrenica enigma. On the 16th anniversary of the Srebrenica massacre this year ICMP claimed that it has “closed 5,564 cases of Srebrenica victims” and that “only about 1,500 remain to be resolved.” However, that announcement is completely at odds with science. By calling persons that it has allegedly identified by using DNA techniques “Srebrenica victims” ICMP is taking a clear position that they were in fact executed prisoners (victims, rather than legitimate combat casualties) and also that their deaths are related to Srebrenica events of July of 1995. Both suggestions are false. DNA technology serves only to identify mortal remains or reassociate disarticulated parts of the same body, but it has absolutely nothing to say about the manner or time of death. ICMP has no means to differentiate “victims,” i.e. executed prisoners, from persons who perished in combat and whose death therefore is not a war crime.The Yugoslav War Crimes Tribunal at The Hague (ICTY) never came up with a conclusive breakdown of casualties.  .  ...........

Mladic arrest: What about the NATO war criminals?

From the very beginning of the war, the Serbs were presented as the new Nazis. Croats and Muslims were presented not as combatants, but as innocent victims.One of the most stubborn factoids of our time is the myth that the massacre at Srebrenica in 1995 during the Bosnian civil war was solely about the killing of innocent Muslims by vicious racist genocidal Serbs. It is a relic of the coordinated media message put out at the time, which demonized the Serbs as cruel oppressors and ignored any atrocities of equal or greater magnitude by other parties to the conflict.The Joseph Goebbels Nazi style “Big Lie”was spread world-wide with the mainstream media-connected resources of a multi-million dollar funded American “public relations” camp; lobbying firm called ‘Ruder Finn’ – whom also worked as a lobbying group in Washington on behalf of the Islamist Nazi terrorist KLA and Tudjman’s HDZ Fascist neo-Ustasha Nazi racist government responsible for the ethnic cleansing of over 350,000 Krajina province Serbs from 1990 to 1995 and for the murder of at least 15,000 Serbs during the same period.James Harff, of PR firm Ruder Finn: Philippe Morillon:The fall of Srebrenica in 1995 was the "direct reaction" to the massacres of Bosnian Serbs by Naser Oric's forces in 1992-1993. Morillon acknowledged that Oric's troops had committed war crimes in eastern Bosnia. Morillon personally witnessed the exhumation of the bodies of Bosnian Serb civilians and soldiers who had been tortured, mutilated, and executed. He saw with his own eyes the Serbian villages that had been burned to the ground in the Srebrenica pocket. More than anyone else, Morillon understood the level of devastation in eastern Bosnia and the extent and nature of the massacres of Bosnian Serbs.“I feared that the Serbs, the local Serbs, the Serbs of Bratunac, these militiamen, they wanted to take their revenge for everything that they attributed to Naser Oric. It wasn’t just Naser Oric that they wanted to revenge, take their revenge on; they wanted to revenge their dead on Orthodox Christmas.”Phillip Corwin, former UN Civilian Affairs Coordinator in Bosnia during the 1990s, said: “What happened in Srebrenica was not a single large massacre of Muslims by Serbs, but rather a series of very bloody attacks and counterattacks over a three year period which reached a crescendo in July of 1995.”The list of 7,000-8,000 Bosnian Muslims contains the names of the individuals who have been reported missing — it is not the list of the victims of a crime, those who have allegedly lost their lives during Srebrenica takeover.The number of 7,000-8,000 missing Bosnian Muslims, presented to the public as the victims of a war crime, is one of the biggest lies and manipulations continually present in this part of the world!There is a world of difference, victims of the war crime are men who have been captured and executed without trial, while the victims of war are individuals who were killed during the battles, like Bosnian Muslim troops from Srebrenica column, which suffered heavy casualties after being engaged in battle with the Bosnian Serb Army.Dr. Ljubisa Simic, pathologist and forensic expert who had full access to the Hague Prosecution’s forensic evidence in relation to the alleged “Srebrenica massacre”, found the scientific evidence of the Srebrenica hoax: the total number of victims, the number of the executed victims, the time of death and the causes of death tell a story that is entirely different from the official myth:Forensic analysis of post-mortem reports :  Internationally respected military forensic specialist Dr Zoran Stankovic, who reviewed the findings of the six experts employed by the Tribunal wrote that the effort lacked standard procedures, several of experts also lacked familiarity with wounds inflicted by military ordinance and some parts of the reports are “contrary to the generally acceptable forensic standards”. According to Dr Stankovic, many of the bodies exhumed from 17 gravesites were found in an advance state of decay “skeletonized, disarticulated and decomposed” lacking soft tissue and body parts that could help determine the cause of death. “Ascertainment of the cause of death in the cases of decomposed bodies is generally extremely difficult and in most case impossible…It is not allowed that [ICTY] experts provide their opinion in that regard and put forward the assumption having no grounds in autopsy findings.”Between 200 and 300 blindfolds and ligatures were exhumed with bodies by the ICTY, and as Dr. Stankovic notes, these are sure signs of execution…  Between 1996 and 2001 a team of investigators led by Australian forensic scientist Dean Manning was employed by the ICTY to exhume graves thought to be associated with the Srebrenica massacre. The team discovered 448 blindfolds and 423 ligatures among the bodies exhumed from the gravesites. They determined that 1,785 individuals died of gunshot wounds, 169 died of probable or possible gunshot wounds, 67 died of Shrapnel wounds or blast injuries, 11 died of gunshot and blast injuries, 6 died of other causes (trauma, suffocation, etc.), and 1441 died of undetermined causes. Investigators also found shell casings among the bodies which indicates that some individuals must have been shot in or near the gravesite.The shell casings were found in the same graves where the blindfolds and ligatures were found. Those buried at the Srebrenica Memorial Complex not only were not killed in July 1995, but actually died much earlier,, even in the early 1980s – more than 10 years before the civil war in Yugoslavia even started: Fetahija (Nazif) Hasanovic, b. 1955 – d. Dec.15, 1996, Srebrenica; Sukrija (Amil) Smajlovic, b.1946 – d. May 2,1996, Zaluzje; Maho (Suljo) Rizvanovic, b.1953 – d. Jan. 3,1993, Glogova; Mefail (meho) Demirovic, b.1970 – d. May 10, 1992, Krasanovici; Redzic (Ahmet) Asim, b.1949 – d. April 22, 1992, of Osman (Ibro) Halilovic (1912-1989), Nurija (Smajo) Memisevic (1966-1993), Salih (Saban) Alic (1969-1992), Mujo (Hasim) Hadzic (1954-1993), Ferid (Ramo) Mustafic (1975-1993) and Hajrudin (Ismet) Cvrk (1974-1992)...............Hamed (Hamid) Halilovic (1940-1982), transferred from the nearby cemetery in Kazani, who apparently died a full 13 years before the Srebrenica "genocide."Several hundred soldiers as well as civilians were transferred to the Srebrenica Memorial from other cemeteries and reburied, with Muslim burial rituals. A careful examination of autopsy reports prepared by ICTY prosecution forensic teams between 1996 and 2002, while it was still believed that documenting 8,000 executions would be a relatively easy task, shows the presence not of 8,000 but of about 1920 corpses (as opposed to “cases”) in Srebrenica related mass graves. Even more importantly, the pattern of injury breakdown shows a variety of likely causes of death, not predominantly the one – execution – that would be expected if the prevailing view of what happened in Srebrenica were correct. Execution certainly is one of them, but combat injury on a mass scale, supported by plenty of incontestable forensic evidence, is another. These findings need to be dealt with. A rational explanation for the abundance of combat injuries in Srebrenica mass graves needs to be proposed, and convincing assurances are required that the thousands killed in combat are not being passed off as execution victims, before any facile conclusions about Srebrenica are drawn. Invoking ICTY verdicts to cut off debate when every other rhetorical device has failed simply does not do the trick. An International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) report, document #37, dated September 13, 1995 states: “Approximately 5,000 Srebrenica Muslim troops left the enclave prior to its fall. In the summer of 2005, on the 10-year anniversary of the event, the "Srebrenica Research Group," composed of mostly American and British media and academic figures, as well as former U.N. civil officials and military observers with ex-Yugoslavia experience, put up a website in which the entire "Srebrenica massacre" account was reconsidered and demystified. Instead of the 7-8,000 figure, U.N. officials and U.S. Congress experts were quoted giving figures of "700-800," "the low hundreds," "about 2,000 Muslims and Serbs total," etc.POLITICAL BACKGROUND—Two prominent supporters (at the time) of the late Muslim leader Alija Izetbegovic, his Srebrenica SDA party chairman Ibran Mustafic and police commander Hakija Meholjic, have subsequently accused Izetbegovic of deliberately sacrificing the enclave in order to trigger NATO intervention. Meholjic is explicit: in his presence,Izetbegovic quoted Bill Clinton/ as saying that 5,000 dead Muslims would be sufficient to provide the political basis for an American-led intervention on the side of the Muslims. a letter to Izetbegovic, Naser Oric, who refused to show up in Sarajevo as a member of the Srebrenica delegation, said the following: “I opposed your decision to surrender Srebrenica which you had arranged with the French and I particularly disagreed with the ensuing events and too many sacrificed civilians, regardless of the effect made. I honoured the agreement and I can tell you that the dearest amount of cash I have ever received is the two million Deutche Marks I collected as a reward on the Yellow Bridge near Bratunac on my way out.”From Kosovo in 1999 to the Congo in 2005, Srebrenica is held up as conclusive proof that the West is morally obliged to intervene militarily in conflict situations. Jack Straw argued in defence of Western intervention in Macedonia in 2001, on the basis that Srebrenica showed what happened when the West was reluctant to intervene. Liberal commentator David Aaronovitch used the same argument to explain his support for military action in Iraq. When discussing the killing of 60 Congolese soldiers by UN troops, UN General Patrick Cammaert argued in favour of robust military intervention, because of ‘the lessons of Srebrenica, Somalia and Rwanda.By falsely identifying Milosevic with the Bosnian Serb leadership and by exploiting the notion that Srebrenica killings were part of a vast Serb plan of "genocide" carried out against non-Serbs for purely racist reasons, Madeleine Albright was able to advocate the NATO war against Yugoslavia as necessary to prevent "another Srebrenica" in Kosovo, where the situation was altogether different. To use "Srebrenica" as an effective instrument in the restructuring of former Yugoslavia, notably by replacing recalcitrant Serb leaders by more pliable politicians, the crime needed to be as big as possible: not a mere war crime (such as the United States itself commits on a serial basis, from Vietnam to Panama to Iraq), but "genocide": "the worst atrocity in Europe since the Holocaust".We all remember the Western media hoaxes and fakery concerning the events in Jenin and Qana recently and how these media frauds were used to demonize Israel and the Jewish people.                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                                                               A documentary film by Norwegian television: 
"Srebrenica: A Town Betrayed" follows interviews and revelations by Bosnian-Muslim investigative journalist Mirsad Fazlic, who doesn’t appreciate the fictitious, black-and-white version of the Bosnian war that is perpetuated by the international community and by Bosnian officialdom, which still honors wartime president Alija Izetbegovic as a national hero when Fazlic and others know he was the opposite. The film really begins only at the four-minute mark, and its main shortcoming is the ubiquitous, stubborn marriage to the notion that the number “7-8,000 killed” is anything other than a concoction that the world has been working backwards for 16 years to make seem real. 
                                                                                                      ...Date: Saturday, March 20, 2003
Place: Srebrenica-Potocari Memorial and Cemetery, Bosnia
Event: Clinton opens a monument dedicated to Al Qaeda fighters and bows to it!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Parade of 10,000 strong unit of Bosnian mujahedins in Bosnian                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      RMTH                                     

zaterdag 25 juni 2011

Ratko Mladic, een tragische held

 Digitised Image

Mladic is gearresteerd: Hoe zit het met de NAVO oorlogsmisdadigers?

Ratko Mladic:Allemaal leugens, meneer de rechter.Ik verdedigde mijn volk en mijn land.Een oorlog waarbij geen doden vallen is onvoorstelbaar.Oorlogstijden zijn geen gewone tijden en in elke oorlog vallen slachtoffers, ook onschuldigen.Enig idee hoeveel mensen er al gestorven zijn in de strijd tegen al-Qaida ? ...Hoezo belegering van Sarajevo? De helft van de gemeente werd toch door Serviërs bewoond?Het aantal Serviers in Sarajevo vermoord tijdens de oorlog door moslim leger, politie en criminelen, ten minste in de vele honderden en waarschijnlijk in de lage duizenden. Srebrenica:wat is daar gebeurd? We weten het nog steeds niet precies. En zullen het misschien ook nooit te weten komen, omdat het zo het makkelijkste is. We hebben daders, slachtoffers en grote woorden zoals ‘genocide’, waarmee we iedere discussie over het gefabriceerde bewijsmateriaal dichtslaan. Zoals het feit dat hele ‘genocide’-ding gebaseerd is op de valse en elkaar tegensprekende getuigenissen van de Bosnisch-Kroatische huurling Drazen Erdemovic. Meer bewijs van een vooropgezet plan, van een systematisch uitgevoerde en vooraf geplande vernietiging van de moslimmannen van Srebrenica is er niet. Germinal Civikov heeft de getuigenissen van Erdemovic uitvoerig beschreven in zijn boek ‘Srebrenica. Der Kronzeuge’‘, dat ik een ieder kan aanraden.De bewering van Bosnische moslims dat na de val van Srebrenica in 1995 meer dan achtduizend moslims slachtoffer werden van genocide, is een mythe. Dit zei ook Radovan Karadzic.Overigens heeft men het ook niet al te nauw genomen met  het tellen van doden/ Mladic beweert dat hij met de Srebrenica genocide[?] niets mee te maken heeft gehad.Evenals de recente studie  ‘The Srebrenica Massacre: Evidence, Context, Politics’‘ onder redactie van Edward S. Herman. Feit blijft dat de TV ons beeld van ‘Srebrenica’ heeft bepaald, zoals oud-directeur van het NIOD Hans Blom onlangs in de Volkskrant terecht aangaf. We denken aan moorden op basis van het scheiden van mannen en vrouwen, maar in werkelijkheid gaat het vooral om militairen en strijdbare mannen die richting Tuzla waren uitgebroken. Een legitiem militair doel dat uit de hand liep, allemaal waar. er word totaal niet gesproken over de rol van de VN / EU en de Nederlandse politiek.Want de rol van deze organisaties is omstreden. Je kunt zeggen van de dutchbatters wat je wilt, ook ik heb mijn vraagtekens over hun handelen (zou jij ermee kunnen leven dat, terwijl jij met een geweer in je hand staat, er voor jou kids worden afgevoerd die worden vermoord?), maar je zal er maar staan... Een mes in de rug van de soldaten. En dan (pas) kom je er als soldaat dus achter dat de regering geen enkele drol om jou geeft (happy wake-up!!). Maar dat is nog niet alles! Verplaats je eens in de rol van die Serviërs, die vermoord en geplunderd werden door Bosniërs / moslims. Over dit feit, dat Serviërs onderdrukt werden, bestaat geen enkele twijfel. Mladic nam het heft in handen (zoals elke goede legerofficier behoort te doen...) en sloeg terug.“Was Srebrenica a Hoax?” .Wat mij opvalt is ook de enorm eenzijdige informatie in de media die over dit onderwerp gegeven word. Mladic word afgeschilderd als een kwaadaardig monster welke genocide heeft gepleegd. Natuurlijk keur ik dit niet goed! Voor de Serven is het wel duidelijk, in hun ogen is Mladic een volksheld die na vele jaren van verdrukking, moord en terreur door moslims op (orthodoxe) christenen, eindelijk terugvecht. Misschien niet vecht op de manier die vastgelegd is in het Verdrag van Genève, maar op een manier die terroristische moslims in Servië een lesje heeft geleerd. Is dit per definitie fout, bekeken vanuit het standpunt van de Servische christenen? En het is algemeen bekend dat de Amerikaanse pr-bureau Ruder Finn werd ingehuurd om ervoor te zorgen dat Serviërs voortaan geassocieerd zouden worden met nazi-Duitsland. Het lag de Serviërs als het ware in de genen, was daarbij de onderliggende boodschap. Schande, want we hadden nog zo gezegd ‘Nie wieder’! Kent u de krantenkoppen over de nieuwe nazi’s nog? Het schertsproces in Den Haag is overduidelijk een geval van overwinnaarsrechtspraak. Tegen de wens van de Serviërs in, weigert het tribunaal om oud-VS-president Bill Clinton, oud-VS-minister Madeleine Albright en andere Navo-verantwoordelijken te dagvaarden, hoewel de Navo-interventies in Bosnië 1995/maar ook operatie “Storm” in Kroatië, met de hulp van de NAVO/ en Servië/Kosovo 1999 onmiskenbaar overtredingen op een aantal internationale rechtsbeginselen vormden en duizenden burgerslachtoffers hebben gemaakt. Overigens wordt een bombardement zelfs niet gerechtvaardigd door het eventuele feit dat slachtoffers de meeste  militairen zijn: het ging nog steeds om naakte agressie.Uiteindelijk zal de Balkan helemaal onder Turkse invloed komen als finaal onderdeel van de wereldregering in wording.Hoe dom kunnen we zijn. Wat nu de Serven overkomt kunnen wij op termijn ook verwachten.Servie is de bescherpoort van het Christendom en de westerse beschaving in Europa, dat moet men niet vergeten!U moet dankbaar an Serviers zijn dat u geen “Mohammed” heet…
 Servische/Chinese/ vrijwilligers tegen jihad.....................................................................................Het was de Bosnische regering die bewust de bewoners van Srebrenica opofferde om de internationale gemeenschap te dwingen in te grijpen.22 juni 1998: Interview met Hakija Meholjic (moslim en hoofd van de politie in Srebrenica) in het Bosnische weekblad Dani: Izetbegovic quoted Bill Clinton                                                                                                                                                                                          Verhaal heeft altijd 2 kanten en dit zijn de Serven  slachtoffers/een deel!!/ ,die werden vermoord  door de moslim's en Naser Oric in Srebrenica.                         (Tanjug)


vrijdag 24 juni 2011

Jihad in the heart of Europe

.Foto:BOSNIA                                    From the 11th century, particularly as Arab power was waning, the Turks moved out into the middle-east eg Syria, Palestine and spread through Asia Minor (much of today’s Turkey) to North Africa and into the Balkans/Eastern Europe.And it's not just during Muhammad's era, or later medieval times, that militant Islam has savagely attacked neighboring cultures, either butchering "infidels" (non-Muslims) outright or converting them at the point of the sword. Jihad has always been a part of Islam.Jihad is an integral Islamic concept, built into its basic tenets and common to all Islamic activists, regardless of whether they regard themselves as followers of Wahhabism or not. Jihad, the holy war, is inseparable from the mainstream teaching of orthodox Islam from the earliest days of Muhammad’s career until our own time. It is therefore not an exclusive province of Wahhabi teaching and practice. A well known fact is that Islam is a totalitarian ideology that rejects democracy, personal freedom, and every other religion.  Another front in the global Jihad. Bosnia is just one more area where the Wahhabis and al Qaeda are taking over. The real crime here is that the West has aided and abetted this.To anyone with some knowledge of the centuries long history of Serbian resistance to Ottoman domination, it was obvious that the return of any form of Islamic power in Bosnia-Herzegovnia would be rejected by Orthodox Christian Serbs.   The five centuries of ‘harmonious and peaceful co-existence’ under Islamic rule, cited by Bosnian president Alija Izetbegovic, belong to the theological dogma of the perfection of the sharia and the dhimma. Before the first shots were fired, Alija Izetbegovic, proudly proclaimed in his “Islamic Declaration” (1974; republished 1990) that “there can be no peace or coexistence between the Islamic faith and non-Islamic societies and political institutions”: “The Islamic movement should and must start taking power as soon as it is morally and numerically strong enough not only to overthrow the existing non-Islamic power structure, but also to build a great Islamic federation spreading from Morocco to Indonesia, from tropical Africa to Central Asia.” For the Orthodox Serbs, however, this same period is considered one of  massacre, pillage, slavery, deportation, and exile of the Christian population.  In their eyes it was a regime which found its justification in the usurpation of their land and denial of their rights; hence it represented the EXACT OPPOSITE of a peaceful, multicultural coexistence based on a system of social and political justice. Kosovo and Bosnia –Herzegovina are the Orthodox Serbian homeland.............during WWII Axis forces invaded Yugoslavia and sponsored the creation of a Nazi Croat state (Ustashi) with which many Bosnian Muslims cooperated.....they formed military corps including the 13th (Hanjar) Waffen SS Division, some of which were trained in FRANCE.  Early in the war, these Muslim slavs actively participated in the genocide of hundreds of thousands of Orthodox Serbs, Jews and gypsies.  Even their German allies were shocked by the bestial atrocities committed then in Yugoslavia’. The European Union proposed a cantonization plan for Bosnia Herzegovina, not very different from the present arrangement, which was accepted by leaders of the Bosnian Muslim, Serb and Croat communities. But both these compromise agreements, which would have prevented war, were rejected by the Muslim party leader Alija Izetbegovic, encouraged by the United States. Throughout the subsequent fighting, the U.S. put obstacles in the way of every European peace plan. Without this US interference, there would have been no Srebrenica massacre, which occurred in the last weeks of the three-and-a-half-year war. Bin Laden himself was a known CIA asset stretching from the late 1970's when he was armed and funded by the CIA through the Pakistani ISI to lead the Muslim mujahideen against the Soviets in Afghanistan.After this, Bin Laden led Al-Qaeda to Bosnia shortly after the outbreak of war in 1992 to fight against Bosnian Serbs who were subsequently the target of NATO air strikes.Shortly before the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999, Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda moved into Kosovo, Serbia’s southern province, to aid the Kosovo Liberation Army/The report/, the Albanian terrorist faction that was being supported by the U.S. and NATO in its terror campaign against Serbs in the region.And the U.S. still supports an independent Kosovo state, a militant Islamic state, in the heart of Europe/Bin Laden’s Balkan Connections . I could go on and on; these incidents are hardly secret, and are well-known in Bosnia.Thousands of mujahedeen who fought in Bosnia went on to perpetrate murder and mayhem in many countries in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, Asia—and the United States. Khalid Sheikh Muhammad—the infamous KSM, the senior al-Qaida operative who planned the 9/11 attacks—was a seasoned veteran of the Bosnian jihad, as were two of the hijackers. It should be noted that the Millennium Plot at the end of December 1999, the narrowly averted al-Qaida attempt to blow up Los Angeles International Airport, was planned by a cell of mujahedeen operating in Montreal, most of them veterans of the Bosnian war, and the operation was controlled out of central Bosnia.Compared to the Middle East or Southwest Asia, the Balkans have been relatively forgotten as a front in the West' war on terror.,1518,516214,00.html                                                                                                                                                                    ....What is this monument inscribed in Arabic script doing in Srebrenica (Potocari village), Bosnia? What is ex-president of the United States, Bill Clinton, doing here at the unveiling of this Arabic-inscribed monument dedicated to fallen al Qaeda Mujahedeen fighters in Srebrenica-Potocari, Bosnia? Why is Clinton bowing to this monument?.Among radical Bosnian Muslim elements, the Srebrenica narrative has been used not only to rally support to the general cause of jihad, to arouse Muslim feelings of having been oppressed and persecuted by non-Muslims, but to build what some have called the "first Muslim shrine in Europe," a gathering place for Muslims from the world over with anti-Western, anti-European and anti-Christian grievances. The Memorial Complex in Srebrenica now serves as a place of pilgrimage, where Muslims can see firsthand the results of what they believe is an unprecedented atrocity against their fellow believers.The entire Srebrenica narrative has been provided key support by Western mainstream media, headed by the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Wall Street Journal and the mainstream British, German and French media, who have laced their Balkan reporting throughout the years with references to the "Srebrenica genocide," calling it, among other things, the "worst atrocity in Europe since World War II," a "stain on the conscience of the West," etc....Unlike the Bosnian Serbs, the Bosnian Muslims enjoyed the services of high-powered U.S. public relations experts in the Washington-based Ruder Finn agency who knew how to "spin" the Bosnian conflict in order to equate the Serbs with the Nazis-the quickest and easiest way to win public opinion over to the Muslim side. The news media and political figures were showered with press releases and other materials exaggerating Serb atrocities, whereas Muslim atrocities (such as the decapitations of Serb prisoners, fully documented) remained confidential. To the public, this was a one-sided conflict between a Serbian "fascist aggressor" and innocent victims, all unarmed civilians.The hidden “Islamic jihad” in Bosnia was covered up, because this suited the needs of interested parties and it was not productive to show America, Alija Izetbegovic, Al-Qaeda, the global jihadist network and other nations working hand in hand. Therefore, the “Muslim victim card” was played up; history was re-written. The Serbians, who had been the victims of Islamic jihad under the Ottomans and then suffered so brutally under the Ustasha/Nazi/Islamic collaboration during World War II, were once more the victim. During the 1990s war, the media clearly sided with the anti-Serbian forces---namely the Croats, Bosnia Muslims and the Albanian Muslims of Kosovo. .................... ......................                                                        .Arab Mujahideen in Bosnia  .....Both the CIA and German intelligence (BND) supported the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), a terrorist organization with links to Al Qaeda.                                                                  

maandag 13 juni 2011

Er was eens een land genaamd Joegoslavië

UCK, UN and NATO leaders
KLA becomes TMK - Nothing changed except the name
Hashim Thaci, UCK leader; Bernard Kouchner UN Administrator of Kosovo
Gen. Sir Mike Jackson KFOR Commander, Agim Ceku, commander of UCK
Gen. Wesley Clarck, NATO commander, October 1999......................................................................................................................................................Ieder volk dat in een staat van zichzelf denkt een minderheid te zijn en zich met on-democratische methodes afscheidt, creëert in het gebied dat het opeist weer een nieuwe minderheid. (Zie Bosnie, zie Kosovo. Etc.) Zou die nieuwe minderheid dan daarna van deze afscheidingsbeweging ook het recht krijgen om zich af te scheiden?Ik denk het niet. Afscheiden betekent dus altijd nieuw onrecht. Daarom zijn afscheidingsbewegingen ondemocratisch en dus misdadig.      Balkan in een koloniale bezetting door de VS en EU! Dat was het plan! Je hoeft werkelijk geen "Milosevic fan" te zijn, om te wijzen op de rol van Internationaal Monetair Fonds, NAVO, geheime diensten van VS, Duitsland etc., oliebedrijven, George Soros, CNN, enz. bij de oorlogen in (ex-)Joegoslavie. Het is geen geheim dat Duitsland het initiatief heeft genomen om Joegoslavië op te blazen.Het gevolg waren de diverse oorlogen in de Balkan, met de noodzakelijke vernietiging van Servië, de belangrijkste macht in Joegoslavië.De strijd in voormalig Joegoslavie was en is een strijd tussen het Duitse en het Amerikaanse kapitaal om daar voet aan de grond te krijgen.Joegoslavië weigerde zich te onderwerpen aan het Westen.De Servische nationale burgerij, onder leiding van Milosevic, wil zich niet onderwerpen aan die buitenlandse overheersing. Ze wil haar politiek en economie niet laten controleren door Duitsland of de Verenigde Staten.De Duitse generaal Klaus Naumann, voorzitter van de militaire commissie van de NAVO:de oorlog tegen Joegoslavië was in de eerste plaats bedoeld om de westerse militaire en economische overheersing in dit deel van Europa te versterken. De imperialisten wisten heel goed dat zij geen kans maakten als ze een directe confrontatie zouden zijn aangegaan, daarom kozen zij ervoor Joegoslavië in stukken te hakken. Voor de lezers die de gebeurtenissen vergeten zijn hierbij nogmaals: De Grondwet van Joegoslavie: Het grondgebied van de Socialistische Federatieve Republiek Joegoslavie is integraal en bestaat uit het grondgebied van de socialistische republieken. De grenzen van de Socialistische Federale Republiek van Joegoslavie niet kan worden gewijzigd zonder de instemming van alle socialistische republieken en autonome gebieden.Dit was alleen mogelijk door middel van de toestemming van alle. Een illegale, gewapende, gewelddadige afscheiding, de gevolgen van die tienduizenden doden, is een MISDRIJF op grond van zowel de interne, Joegoslavische en het internationaal recht.Volgens de akkoorden van Helsinki en het internationale volkerenrecht hebben de Joegoslaven volledig gelijk dat zij hun land niet laten opdelen. Elke andere Joegoslavische leider zou hetzelfde hebben gedaan" (Raymond Detrez, Parijs/Gent, april 1999). Door het Duitse succes inzake separatistische Kroatie,Slovenie, verschenen in 1992 ook de Amerikanen op het Balkantoneel,uit rivaliteit.De logistieke (wapens) en andersoortige ondersteuning van de strijders door de CIA en de financiële (3,5 miljard dollar) steun door allerlei Islamistische (vooral Wahabi georiënteerde) fondsen en NGO's.Pentagon gecoördineerd Iran en Saoedi-militaire interventie in Bosnië, aan de kant van Izetbegovic, tegen de Bosnische Serviërs en gematigde moslims.Het einddoel van Alija Izetbegovic in Bosnie was de dzamahirija, de islamitische staat. Feit: De Albanese Kosovaren hadden onder Tito een grote mate van autonomie, zoals eigen scholen, universiteiten en culturele instellingen. Nauwelijks twee maanden na de dood van  Tito was er in Pristina een betoging van Albanese Kosovaren die onafhankelijkheid eisten.De speciale gezant van Washington in de Balkan, Robert Gelbard, had zelf tot drie keer toe voor de internationale pers bevestigd, begin 1998, dat “die lui van het UCK terroristen zijn.” Maar drie maand later heetten die terroristen plots “vrijheidsstrijders” en zou de Navo hun luchtmacht worden.De NAVO steunde gangsterbendes, drugsmaffia en terroristen, toen ze 350.000 Serviërs uit hun vaderland in Kosovo en Metohija verdreven.Niemand ontkent dat er individuele misdaden op de Servische zijde. Toch kan niemand geloofwaardig beweren dat deze misdaden waren een gevolg van de Servische leiders het beleid.Wie is er wél onschuldig tijdens een oorlog?Maarrrrrrr,in Neurenberg werd niemand veroordeeld voor het bombardement op Dresden!!?In elke oorlog vallen onschuldige slachtoffers. Maar als we daarvan moeten uitgaan, dan kan een land [of volk] zichzelf nimmer meer verdedigen.De VS en Europa hadden 'slachtoffers' nodig om hun oorlog te voeren! Dat het in de Balkanrlog tegen Joegoslavie vooral om oliebelangen ging en niet om ‘mensenrechten’ en ‘democratie’, is iedereen al lang duidelijk.Door die gebieden lopen namelijk reusachtige pijpleidingen, die door de Westerse landen beschermd moeten worden tegen lastige regimes als  Joegoslavië. Na 1999 bouwden de VS in gestolen Servische Kosovo en Metochia  de legerbasis ‘Camp Bondsteel’. Dat blijkt zowat de belangrijkste strategische doelstelling van de VS in hun oorlog tegen Joegoslavië.Camp Bondsteel ligt vlakbij belangrijke oliepijplijnen die doorheen de zuidelijke Balkan worden gebouwd. Ze moet olie doorvoeren die aankomt in de Bulgaarse oliehaven Burgas aan de Zwarte zee, door Macedonia naar de Albanese haven Vlore aan de Adriatische zee.Bondsteel wordt gezien als een belangrijke schakel in de reorganisatie van de Amerikaanse basissen in Europa en meer naar het Oosten. De Washington Post schreef al in 1999 tijdens de oorlog: “Met een steeds fragieler Midden-Oosten, hebben we vliegbases nodig en vliegrechten vanuit de Balkan, om de olie in de Kaspische zee te beschermen”. Voormalig minister van energie van de Verenigde Staten, Bill Richardson, verklaarde in 1998 voorafgaande aan het Kosovo conflict dat "Dit allemaal draait om de energie veiligheid van de Verenigde Staten.Als we sterke economische relaties willen om onze produkten over de hele wereld te kunnen verkopen, dan neemt Europa daarbij een sleutelpositie in Daarover gaat dit 'Kosovo-ding''. Met deze uitspraak laat president Clinton er weinig twijfel over bestaan dat de oorlog tegen Joegoslavië een veroveringsoorlog is die weinig te maken heeft met humanitaire motieven.Wie is het volgende slachtoffer? WAAROM IS DE NAVO IN VOORMALIGE JOEGOSLAVIE?: )